Aug 14, 2024

chat

Appeals Court Sides With Facebook Factcheckers

More than ever before, first amendment rulings made by the courts can either be detrimental or beneficial to the freedom of speech, especially as it pertains to the digital town square. Questioning the science in a social media post could be construed as misinformation or a danger to society. Sharing an article could mean an account is suspended or surveilled. And when the government gets involved in matters of censorship, its citizens have a duty to hold accountable these actions through litigative and legislative action. In this week’s “Defender In-Depth,” viewers get an important update on the legal battle for free speech with special guest Mary Holland, Esq. Tune in!

*The opinions expressed by the hosts and guests in this show are not necessarily the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Resources

Breaking: Appeals Court Dismisses Whistleblower Lawsuit Against Merck Over MMR Vaccine

WHO Triggers Emergency Use Listing for Monkeypox Vaccines

Government Spending Millions on 'Cognitive Vaccines' to 'Protect' Public From 'Fringe' Viewpoints

Cellphone Radiation Causes Cheek Cells to Die, Study Finds

Family of Boy Vaccinated Without Consent at School Asks Maine Supreme Court to Hear Case

'They Have to Be Stopped': Woman Says COVID Hospital Protocols Caused Husband's Death

Breaking: Appeals Court Sides With Facebook in CHD Censorship Lawsuit

Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc. | Ruling

Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc. | Lawsuit

Federal Judge Grants Facebook's Motion to Dismiss in CHD v. Facebook

CHD Attorneys Argue Against Motion to Dismiss Facebook Censorship Lawsuit

Recording : : Children's Health Defense v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Supreme Court Hearings on Section 230 Point to Broader Showdown Over Future of Online Speech

47 U.S. Code § 230 - Protection for Private Blocking and Screening of Offensive Material

Communications Decency Act and Section 230 (1996)

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Biden Administration in Censorship Case - but CHD, Kennedy Lawsuit to Move Forward

RFK Jr. and CHD Sue Biden, Fauci for Alleged Censorship

Kennedy v. Biden | Lawsuit Text

Murthy v Biden and Kennedy v Biden Consolidated

Kennedy v Biden Injunction

Kennedy v Biden Injunction Text

Biden Administration Files Emergency Motion to Strike Down Injunction in RFK Jr., CHD Censorship Case

NIH Can't Remove Negative Comments About Animal Testing From Social Media Pages, Court Rules

The Disinformation Dozen - Center for Countering Digital Hate | CCDH

New 'Facebook Files' Add to Evidence Biden Pressured Facebook to Censor 'Disinformation Dozen'

Group Behind 'Disinformation Dozen' Has Ties to Hollywood, Corporate Dems

White House Colluded With Twitter to Censor RFK Jr., Emails Reveal

New 'Facebook Files' Add to Evidence Biden Pressured Facebook to Censor 'Disinformation Dozen'

Government Documents Confirm the Biden Administration’s Mobilization of U.S. Counterterrorism Assets to Support Imran Ahmed’s Global Censorship Campaign

Independent Fact-Checking Organizations Exhibit a Departure From Political Neutrality

Whistleblower Will Appeal After Federal Court Dismisses Lawsuit Alleging Fraud in Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trials

Related Videos

Children's Health Defense® is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Our mission is ending childhood health epidemics by eliminating toxic exposure. We will restore and protect the health of children by eliminating environmental exposures, holding responsible parties accountable, and establishing safeguards to prevent future harm of children's health.  Protecting Children. Exposing Harms. Seeking Justice.

Donations are tax deductible to the full extent of the law. EIN #26-0388604

© 2016 - 2024 Children's Health Defense® All Rights Reserved