Very few doctors and scientists have actually looked deeply at the American vaccine program which now encompasses 76 vaccine doses. As more and more vaccines get approved to go onto the CDC recommended pedicatric vaccine schedule, we see and ever increasing epidemic of chronic pediatric health problems. CHD presented this panel of experts that have studied the vaccine schedule and correlating health outcomes during the Rise+Resist 2023 Conference.

—-----------------------------

Brian S. Hooker, Ph.D., is Chief Scientific Officer at Children’s Health Defense, an organization committed to the best health for children in the U.S. and worldwide. He is also Emeritus Professor of Biology at Simpson University in Redding, California, where he specialized in microbiology and biotechnology. Dr. Hooker has been active in vaccine safety research and advocacy since 2001 and has a 25-year-old son with autism.

Christina Parks, Ph.D. earned her Ph.D. in Cellular and Molecular Biology in the field of cytokine signaling. Thus, Dr. Parks brings a wealth of knowledge about how vaccines affect the immune system. She has spent many years studying the biochemistry of how pharmaceuticals and natural substances affect the expression of genes and biochemical pathways that are essential to our health and well-being.

Paul Thomas, M.D.Dr. Thomas, affectionately known as Dr. Paul, is a father of nine with 35 years of experience as a pediatrician. He was board-certified in pediatrics for 30 years until the Oregon Medical Board persecution destroyed his pediatric practice, Integrative Pediatrics. He published “The Vaccine-Friendly Plan” book and the important vaxxed–unvaxxed study of real-world patient data from his practice showing how incredibly healthy unvaccinated patients are compared to those on the vaccine-friendly plan. His published work includes the article on aluminum toxicity showing infants spend 30 – 70% of their first seven months above toxic levels of aluminum in their bodies when following the CDC-recommended schedule and an article exposing the payment incentives to doctors for vaccination. He now educates at doctorsandscience.com and https://kidfirst4ever.substack.com. He is coaching, educating, & standing for medical freedom, informed consent and data sharing.

DeeDee Hoover, LMT, PMT, CCT has been licensed for over 30 years as a massage therapist. The focus of her work now is early infant care and body work for special pediatric health conditions that are responsive to body work and coaching. So many conditions for infants and children respond well to body work. Vaccine effects and injuries is an area of focus, where education and coaching can have a huge impact on health outcomes for children. Working with families to help their child involves coaching and educating the parents and caregivers as to continue the work in addition to sessions with DeeDee. She wellness coaches' kids and families in many areas. Her ability to help kids in crisis is extraordinary. The support she has given to many families has been life-changing.

Dr. Lyons-Weiler is CEO and Director of IPAK, The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge and founder of IPAK-EDU LLC, an online university where students can experience higher education training in many areas to help them empower themselves through knowledge. He is Editor-in-Chief of Science, Public Health Policy and the Law and writes Popular Rationalism (http://popularrationalism.substack.com).

If there was a draft for the medical freedom movement, John Stockton would likely be a top pick. But what brought this acclaimed athlete, holding multiple NBA records and hall of fame titles, over to the no-mandate, informed consent team? Once headlining the news as the greatest basketball player of all time, Stockton has more recently made headlines for his controversial stance on masking and vaccination. But his journey began years prior to the onset of the COVID pandemic. Once donning #12, Stockton now brandishes a much more eye-catching symbol — one of freedom and bodily autonomy. Hear from this big-name athlete, today, on CHD.TV!

The COVID “cover-up” and the “etiology of gain-of-function research” — Robert F. Kennedy Jr., while writing the last chapter of his bestselling book, ‘The Real Anthony Fauci,’ stumbled upon a startling sort-of ‘canary in a coal mine’ — an “acorn.” From this small seed sprouted an incriminating, seemingly-endless stockpile of research into the genesis of bioweapons and its shocking implications for the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It developed into a written record with the potential to send shockwaves across the globe, compiled into ‘The Wuhan Cover-Up: The Terrifying Bioweapons Arms Race.’ In this book, RFK Jr. uncovers several truths:

• The U.S. bioweapons program is said to be modeled off of German and Japanese scientific research, called ‘Operation Paperclip.’
• By 1969, the U.S. bioweapons program had the capacity to kill with the level of efficiency as that of nuclear weapons.
• Around that same time, Nixon terminated the program and set up a treaty to halt stockpiling and use of the weapons.
• 2001 was when the anthrax attacks took place, ushering in the Patriot Act, which launched a “new bioweapons arms race.”
• This provided an open door for Anthony Fauci to take over biodefense at NIAID.
• The Cambridge Working Group was born, in response to a 2014 lab-leak, and then-president Barack Obama issued a moratorium, ordering the termination of 18 of Fauci’s projects.
• Rather than shutting down, many of those labs relocated to offshore locations, such as Ukraine and Wuhan.
• Two techniques were passed from America to the Wuhan scientists. In one of which, the RNA virus is developed into a “more stable” DNA clone. The other provides a pathway to “hide all evidence of human tampering.”

We now live in a world where pandemic preparedness and response (PPR) is the ideological, mainstream narrative with three major goals: to find every virus-causing bug that exists or could exist, to execute potentially-dangerous gain-of-function research as a defense strategy and to coordinate a “governmental response…that will deed authority to the WHO and coordinate another clamp-down of authoritarian controls to remove democratic and civil rights from nations and individuals.”

Read more about this powerful story in ‘The Wuhan Cover-Up,’ and hear an exclusive interview with its author Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on ‘Good Morning CHD.’

On today’s ‘Defender In-Depth,’ Michael Nevradakis interviews Dale Saran, an attorney representing service members who were discharged for opting out of COVID-19 vaccination. In this episode, Dale and Michael do a deep-dive into 3 related class-action lawsuits.

Dale Saran is a retired Major (USMCR) who served as a judge advocate and helicopter pilot for more than 20 years. As a defense attorney in 1999, then Captain Saran defended Marines who refused the controversial anthrax vaccine, and later worked on the Doe v. Rumsfeld cases in federal court that enjoined the DoD's (and FDA's) illegal mandate to take the unlicensed vaccine. He went on to be in-house counsel for CrossFit, Inc. and continued as a defense counsel in the Marine Corps Reserve. He currently makes his home in Kansas.

Forced into early retirement after the mandated COVID shot left him with permanent heart damage, guest O’Brian Pastrana is seeking legal recourse. And he is not the only one who wants to see justice carried out for the harms that these required injections have inflicted on countless individuals and families. Some lost their careers, many suffered physical and emotional pain, others were left handicapped. Learn how their rights are being fought for in this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’

No small matter: mRNA vials potentially contaminated with DNA plasmids could be a major bombshell into the COVID shot rollout. Jessica Rose, Ph.D. provides updates on this research topic as well as related reports from the media. Dr. Rose also shares her thoughts on who could be charged for the harms that this vaccine campaign has perpetrated on the global population. Listen in on the eye-opening conversation on ‘Good Morning CHD.’

Tune in to CHD.TV’s weekly show with Mary Holland and Polly Tommey, in which they discuss relevant stories from ‘The Defender’ and beyond. Today, viewers learn about vaccination campaigns and media propaganda, various health-related lawsuits, viral ‘threats,’ food supply threats and more. Be sure to watch!

In the first installment of her series ‘21st Century Dr. Frankensteins’ Alexis Baden-Mayer, Political Director at the Organic Consumers Association takes a deep dive into the nightmarish sci-fi world of today’s mad scientists, starting with George Church, Bayer’s synthetic biology spokesman. What do synthetic biology, the mRNA gene revolution, artificial wombs, life on Mars, and Jeffrey Epstein have to do with one another? Find out on today’s fascinating episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’

After Dr. Mark Skidmore published the results of his study on COVID-19 vaccinations, he was met with hostility, and the paper was retracted. Was the response from his academic peers appropriate? Did the retraction have legitimate justification? Dr. Skidmore shares his thoughts on this debacle in this episode of ‘Doctors & Scientists’ on CHD.TV.

What is the state of Canada, in November 2023? Since the onset of the COVID pandemic, strides have been made in the pursuit of medical freedom for this North American country. But there is much left to do if citizens’ voices are to be heard and injuries are to be acknowledged. Shawn Buckley, LLB has been leading the charge in this arena and joins ‘Financial Rebellion’ to highlight the efforts being made to give Canadians a platform to testify to the harms they have experienced and discuss ways to move forward in a promising fashion.

Shawn Buckley is a constitutional lawyer who is passionate about health rights. He has worked as lead counsel for the National Citizens Inquiry and president of the National Health Products Protection Association.

Welcome back to another ‘Defender In-Depth’ with Michael Nevradakis on CHD.TV! Today, Michael is joined by VAERS Aware advocate, Albert Benavides, who shares details from an incriminating article on the investigation into the deficiencies of vaccine adverse event reporting, including the second system which is kept hidden from the public. What information are our public health agencies trying to withhold from us? Watch the show to find out!

Albert Benavides has been in the medical billing revenue cycle management department for over 20 years. He is a former HMO Claims Auditor and medical billing company owner. Albert now runs the website vaersaware.com, an interactive VAERS visualization system.

For those families who were denied access to alternative COVID treatments and the doctors who were punished for trying to prescribe them, will there be any justice? Deborah Bucko and Dr. Pierre Kory are just two of those many victims who suffered at the hands of the medical regime. But before we hear from our guests about their pursuit of COVID treatment justice, attorney Bobbie Anne Cox provides an urgent update to the New York quarantine camp controversy. Viewers, don’t miss it!

Scott Mantel lost his wife in 2021 and sued on her behalf against the healthcare system where she was being treated at for COVID when she passed away.

Bobbie Anne Cox is a New York civil rights attorney, and a Fellow at the Brownstone Institute. She has been practicing law for over 20 years. Formerly with a large, international law firm, Attorney Cox is now the principal at Cox Lawyers, PLLC.

Dr. Pierre Kory is the president and co-founder of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC). He has testified in front of the U.S. Senate and is outspoken about alternative COVID therapies.

Mr. Warshawsky is an attorney based in New York. His practice focuses on employment law and civil rights law, with a growing emphasis on medical freedom cases.

James Corbett and Dr. Meryl Nass return to “Good Morning CHD” to chronicle the latest Oct. 30 draft of the WHO Pandemic Treaty — now pegged the pandemic ‘agreement’. As the clock counts down until the May 2024 World Health Assembly, the time has come for free and sovereign individuals of the world to reclaim their sovereignty, and fast. James and Meryl elucidate what a “complete reimagination” of the world’s power structure looks like, walking us through the game plan of the opponent’s multi-angled attack to bring about their “New World Dis-Order,” and provide us with inspirational solutions to fight back. Learn their strategies and get a grasp of the bigger picture in this episode of “Good Morning CHD.”

“This is an amazing story”, inquiries by the BMJ reveal glaring deficiencies as VAERS runs a back end private system. Also on tap this week, more than a third of Americans “not concerned” about COVID + flu season, more parents than ever are opting out of routine childhood immunizations. Search for the truth beyond the fear-mongering headlines alongside Mary Holland and Polly Tommey on ‘This Week’.

Are you aware that:

• There exists a vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) and corresponding ‘vaccine court’?
• Filed VICP petitions are not against the manufacturers but rather the U.S. Department of Health and Human services?
• Between October 1988 and November 2023, over 10,000 petitions have resulted in compensation?
• In that same time period, over 800 filed injuries have specifically concerned HPV?
• The system has transitioned from “presumed” causation to a situation where “medical testimony, scientific studies” are needed to prove causation?
• Table injuries are “limited” — such as in the case of HPV, in which 3 injuries are covered within a specific time frame after vaccine administration?
• Gardasil contains an aluminum adjuvant?
• Multidistrict litigation is ongoing in the courts concerning these Gardasil injections?

Join Kim Mack Rosenberg and her 2 guest attorneys on ‘Good Morning CHD’ for a conversation about the VICP and HPV.

Drew Downing is the founding partner of Downing, Allison & Jorgenson, a nationally recognized law firm specializing in vaccine injury litigation. Drew has been representing vaccine injured victims and their families for 25 years.

Anthony Liberatore has served from 2005 to present at THE LIBERATORE LAW FIRM (FORMERLY A. LIBERATORE, P.C., A LAW FIRM) Sole member and lead trial attorney.  Firm pursues justice for the seriously injured and wrongful death survivors. Areas of practice include personal injury (pedestrian, car, truck, bus and train crashes, falls, toxic exposure, burns, traumatic brain injury, wrongful handling of human remains, sexual attacks, negligent security, construction, and business operations), dangerous drugs, vaccine injury, surrogacy negligence, medical device product defect, and medical injury.

As technology “is encroaching and growing in individuals’ lives,” what role does the law play in protecting human rights, especially that of children? Joining the ‘Good Morning CHD’ hosts, today, are 3 legal professionals who share their thoughts on this relevant, urgent topic. Viewers won’t want to miss out on the conversation!

Would you, knowingly, put the chemicals used to wash dishes and the heavy metals in antiperspirant products into your mouth? Unlike soap and aluminum, the foods we eat may appear and taste to be harmless, and so often we consume them without truly knowing where they came from, what they’re made of and if they’ve been contaminated. On today’s ‘Financial Rebellion’ menu: Sink your teeth in with Elze van Hamelen and get a taste of the true essence of modern cuisine, dished up by yours truly, Big Pharma.

Elze van Hamelen researches technocracy, surveillance, food systems, behavior manipulation and more. She writes for Catherine Austin Fitts’ ‘Solari Report,’ which includes the publications ‘Pharma Food’ and ‘The Dutch Farmers and Fishermen.’ Elze also contributes to an independent Dutch newspaper.

This week’s ‘Defender In-Depth’ goes deep into the relationship between CDC data, life insurance statistics, excess mortality and sudden deaths in young people. Host Michael Nevradakis welcomes on Mathew Crawford to discuss.

Join Michael Kane and Dawn Richardson on ‘Good Morning CHD’ as they reflect back on vaccine-related legislation in 2023. This year was a groundbreaking time, in which more of these NVIC-supported bills than ever before were passed into law. But before they discuss this important issue, viewers get a rundown of relevant headlines from the media. Watch the show on CHD.TV!

Watch today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ for a faith-filled, empowering episode with two truth warrior guests. Teryn Gregson, fired from her position as a golf broadcaster during COVID mandates, joins to discuss her documentary and why she chooses gratitude in the midst of tumultuous times. Also in this episode: Rev. Dr. Jason Garwood shines a light on CHD’s Faith Leaders Coalition and how YOU can get involved. Take part in the conversation on CHD.TV!

This is another jam-packed episode of ‘This Week’ on CHD.TV. To kick it off, Mary Holland and Polly Tommey comment on a handful of litigative efforts — concerning a “very injurious vaccine” and liability protections under an “unconstitutional law.” They also share their thoughts on ‘accidental’ vaccine dosing errors, sudden infant deaths, escalating death rates, hospital protocol deaths, mass immunization campaigns, airport virus surveillance and more. Tune in!

Should children be allowed to consent to medical procedures without the knowledge of their parents? For example, when kids are offered vaccines at school-based health centers, should the staff be required to communicate that to the legal guardian? Who is responsible for communicating family history to those administering care? What happens when a child is injured by a certain product or operation? And on whom does the financial and caretaking burden fall in such a situation? Listen to a detailed deliberation on these matters and to learn how the courts are fighting back against threats to the “vulnerable” younger generations in this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’

Sudden, aggressive cancers on the rise? Watch ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week for an in-depth presentation on this deadly phenomenon. Guest David Rasnick, Ph.D. has been in the biochemistry sphere for decades, involved in the research of AIDS and other “tissue-destroying diseases.” To get to the root of the media-coined ‘turbo cancer,’ Dr. Rasnick has put together a damning compilation of scientific research on the topic, both dating back to the 1960s and hot off the press. Viewers, don’t miss his mind-boggling interview!

Tune in to this week’s episode ‘Financial Rebellion’ to hear from Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts as they recap health freedom events and share the importance of finding community and working in unity with one another. Be sure to watch!

Four years after COVID-19 made its debut in the mainstream media, much has been uncovered about its genesis. Terms, such as ‘Wuhan’ and ‘gain-of-function’ and ‘lab-leak theory,’ have spread like an infection among the public, becoming commonplace in legislative hearings, lawsuits, universities, at dinner tables, on social media and beyond. In the meantime, investigative journalist Paul Thacker has refused to shy away from this controversial topic and as a result, dug up important and shocking information that has contributed to the discussion on COVID’s origins. He joins Michael Nevradakis on CHD.TV’s ‘Defender In-Depth’ to share the details.

Today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ lineup is worth betting on. We’ve got NBA hall-of-fame athlete John Stockton, NBA referee Ken Mauer and former state senator Dr. Scott Jensen joining the show today to talk about sports mandates and relevant litigation. Don’t miss this exciting episode!

Fires in Malibu — related to cell towers? Addictive technology, exploiting kids? And what is the deal with the biometric ID push for newborns in Kenya? These ‘Good Morning CHD’ guest attorneys tackle lawsuits that involve the Big Tech industry, concerning privacy and surveillance, dangerous levels of radiation and enslavement to the digital regime. Be sure to watch!

…and we’re LIVE from the 2023 CHD Conference in Savannah, Georgia with Mary Holland and Polly Tommey and an annual wrap-up on the year’s top news. In the episode, Mary encourages the audience with these words, “We are an army for the children, and it’s for health and for freedom. And together, we are making a difference.” Viewers, don’t miss this exciting episode of ‘This Week’!

This is a jam-packed episode of ‘Good Morning CHD,’ LIVE from the 2023 CHD Conference in Savannah, Georgia. First, Scott Schara and attorney Mendenhall share updates on their lawsuit — particularly as it relates to the topics of medical battery and informed consent. Then, viewers hear from Dr. Suzanne Humphries, who summarizes her speech given the conference, taking viewers back in time to the early 1800s and poking holes in the contemporary, mainstream narrative on vaccination.

The information contained in this episode is for informational purposes only. No material is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Look no further — Dr. Lawrence Palevsky joins ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week to share his insights into children’s health, and he doesn’t cut any corners. Dr. Palevsky answers questions that many parents, both new and old, have about the things that are anticipated when it comes to raising a family. For example, he answers questions, such as:

• What makes kids sick?
• Do I need to worry about fevers?
• How prevalent are bacteria?
• Are there any ways to promote immunity, naturally?

Viewers, tune in!

Deciphering the financial world can be a challenging task, but it is a valuable skill in a dynamic economy — especially when cybersecurity, digitization, mortgages and stocks are involved. Catherine Austin Fitts, in this episode of ‘Financial Rebellion,’ asks a disconcerting yet crucial question: “What are you gonna do if you’re shut down off the internet from your bank account…Are you prepared for that?” And Carolyn Betts warns, “It’s almost really impossible to function in a society without the [biometric] ID.” Viewers, don’t miss this show on CHD.TV!

For the first installment of ‘Defender In-Depth’ on CHD.TV, Michael Nevradakis and Kim Witczak deep-dive into the story behind the story on the topic of drug safety. They spotlight the story of Kim’s husband, whose death by suicide has been associated with a well-known antidepressant. Viewers won't want to miss this eye-opening episode!

Get ready for your state's upcoming legislative session. NY Grassroots Health Freedom Activist Michael Kane hosts John Gilmore of Autism Action Network + Julie Booras of Health Rights Massachusetts to discuss two astonishing bills that greatly threaten parental rights TODAY on “Good Morning CHD”.

Cameroon, Africa: post-Yellow Fever vaccination, a baby went unconscious and “lost use of her limbs before becoming completely blind” with “irreversible brain damage.” The child’s mother joins ‘Good Morning CHD’ to share the heartbreaking details. Following their segment, viewers learn about the pushback from Maori’s indigenous grassroots community against medical tyranny. Tune in!

Viewers, watch today’s episode of ‘This Week’ to learn about pertinent topics from the news — cardiac arrest, DNA contamination, self-administered flu shots, bugs in the food supply, weight-loss injections, AI therapy and more. This, and more, on CHD.TV!

“The state of our children’s health is abysmal,” “We have a childhood health epidemic” express the panelists in this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’ These individuals have been fighting for a resilient, nutritious and clean food supply, not only advocate for organic, regenerative, locally-grown foods but also do the research to ensure that what we eat will nourish and heal, rather than harm, us. Today, three guest panelists and host Kelly Ryerson share the alarming findings of a study that has the potential to shake the foundations of ‘school lunch’ as we know it.

Don’t miss this exciting episode of ‘Doctors & Scientists,’ in which Haig John, D.C. and Brian Hooker, Ph.D. plumb the depths of the human body’s capacity to create and sustain life. Dr. John has a passion for helping pregnant women throughout the child-bearing process by using chiropractic as a support system for healthy digestion, birthing and other components related to the development and delivery of an infant. Today, he shares the details of his work.

Have you ever wondered how deeply-entrenched the lies about public health really go? In that vein, do things like weather modification, gut parasites and fluoridated water really exist? Are there heavy metals in vaccines? Can we trust the USDA dietary recommendations, such as the food pyramid? And are there any alternatives to dental care, cancer therapies, autoimmune disorders and food consumption? Tune in to ‘Financial Rebellion’ with guest Jennifer Walters to find out!

What does the violence of war have to do with health? Today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ host is Ilana Rachel Daniel. In her perspective, greed for power and money acts like a global infection — affecting citizens of every country and impacting the lives of every individual — when those who crave its taste turn to bloodshed to be filled to the brim. But will they ever be satisfied? Find out how the horrors and crooks of warfare pose a threat to the freedoms we take for granted in this episode on CHD.TV.

Shocking and potentially deadly: during in-depth testing of the contents in COVID-19 injection vials, scientist Kevin McKernan stumbled upon identifying contaminants with severe consequences for the human race. What did he find, and why does this discovery matter? Watch the jaw-dropping interview on CHD.TV’s daily show, ‘Good Morning CHD’ to find out!

Transcript

Mary

Well, welcome, Dr. Kevin McKernan and Dr. Brian Hooker. I'm really thrilled to have both of you here with us. Brian, you're, of course, our Science Director here at Children's Health Defense. And Kevin, you have an incredibly impressive background in science. Would you just give us the quick highlights so that our viewers know how extensive your scientific credentials are?

Kevin McKernan

Oh, certainly. Well, I guess I'll shoot myself in the foot and tell you I dropped out of a PhD program, so I never got my doctorate. But I have been working in the genomics field for 25 years now. I started on the Human Genome Project with Eric Lander down at the Whitehead Institute at MIT, was managing the research and development team there through the scale-up of the Human Genome Project. And then after that, spun a bunch of companies. At least Agencourt is one company we spun out of MIT that builds magnetic DNA purification tools, which may play a role in this story, and we also built some PCR tests there and had a genome center. That company got acquired by Beckman Coulter, and then we spun another company out called Agencourt Personal Genomics that built the SOLiD sequencer. That one got acquired by Applied Biosystems, and I worked with Applied Biosystems for five years building various DNA sequencers, including some semiconductor systems. I have done some clinical sequencing. We had a CLIA lab for a while that was doing sequencing of epilepsy and mitochondrial disease in kids, and that's kind where I first ran into a lot of parents telling me about vaccine injuries. And then we went into the cannabis arena where we're sequencing cannabis genomes, because many of the epileptic parents were looking for safe and effective cannabidiol, which was helping with seizures. So we got interested in that field and somehow I ended up here, sequencing a vaccine by mistake, and found something that people seem to be interested in. It's a long, winding road to where I'm now.

Mary

Super. Tell us about this study that you did, where I think you were using these vials of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines as controls. Is that right?

Kevin McKernan

Yes.

Mary

And you've stumbled on an incredibly important finding.

Kevin McKernan

Yeah, we're trying to sort out the pathology of a viroid that's devastating the cannabis field, so we were doing RNA sequencing and the pipeline broke.

Mary

Well, wait. Let's go back. Viroid? Tell us what that is, Kevin.

Kevin McKernan

Oh, a viroid is a naked piece of RNA that is infectious in itself. It doesn't have any protein code around it, so you can synthesize these and actually put them into plants, and they create some RNA interference and there's some pathology that results from this. They don't affect mammals, but they infect plants and they can be devastating. It's probably knocking down the yields in plants like 40% in this industry. Everyone's trying to understand this 256-letter piece of sequence that's a pathology in plants, at least in the cannabis plant right now. When we were sequencing the RNA of the cannabis genome to see what was happening when it got infected, we started getting all this sequencing data back that didn't look like it was concentrated on genes, and that's a sign that your RNA purification system might be broken. So the way to solve that and figure that out is to spike in a pharmaceutical grade RNA to see if you find out where it's broken. And I figured, well, these are probably pharmaceutical grade if they're injecting them into people. I'll use one of those. It has a polyA tag on it. It should stick to our magnetic beads, and it should tell us if we have an RNA prep problem or if something else is wrong. What I didn't expect to get out of the experiment was the contaminant that I then was pregnant with to tell the world about, that okay, it worked as a control. It taught us that we had a DNase problem in our RNA sequencing pipeline, but now I see there's a plasmid in here that I can't hide from and I've got to put it public as quickly as I can, as responsibly as I can. And so we chose to do that by releasing all of these really rapid Substack articles, because we just couldn't see this getting through the peer review process in a timely manner given the political nature of it right now. And so that's where we ended up.

Mary

Great. I'm mindful that I'm ignorant. I'm not a scientist. Walk us back a little bit. Explain to our viewers, what is a plasmid? What did you find here? What does that mean for us?

Kevin McKernan

When the clinical trials with... I want to be clear. This is mostly pertaining to Pfizer. We sequence Pfizer and Moderna, but there's different background to them. Pfizer's trial started by generating, you need to make this RNA. In order to make this RNA, you need to feed a DNA template to read the RNA from. It's called an in vitro transcription reaction. You present an RNA polymerase with a piece of DNA and it starts making RNA off of it. It's the ink for your Xerox machine, if you will. They started the clinical trial with DNA that was amplified with PCR, which is really clean DNA, because when you amplify it, it raises the amount of DNA from background a millionfold. There's no residual background. You get a really clean piece of DNA that you can make your RNA from. That was what the trial was run on, is called Process 1. Retsef Levi and Josh Guetzkow have a good paper on this in the BMJ. Then after the trial was done, they did the bait and switch and they changed the manufacturing process for scale-up by taking that piece of DNA that they PCR'd and used as a template in Process 1. They plugged it into a bacterial plasmid, which is just a circular piece of DNA that allows a bug like E. coli to replicate it every 30 minutes. That means they can have an infinite supply of their DNA. They just have to keep growing the E. coli day to day, and they don't ever have to use PCR again, so it's a real massive cost reduction for them. But it comes with some additional risk, is that you now have this DNA being replicated in E. coli and it's not good to inject people with E. Coli, so you have to get the DNA out of E. coli. And the process of getting that DNA out of E. coli comes with inherent contaminants that weren't in the original trial. The plasmid DNA is one of them, which is a large, 7,800-base pair piece of DNA, and then there's also the potential for endotoxin to come through from the E. coli. So, there's the material difference between the trial and what people actually got, and that's an important part of the story that everyone needs to know. Now what we're trying to do is figure out, what is the consequence of this plasma DNA being in there? They knew it was there. They tried to get rid of it by chewing it up with an enzyme, but they didn't get rid of it completely. They got it halfway chewed up.

Brian Hooker

Why didn't they get rid of it completely? I mean, they use an enzyme called DNase, and DNase breaks down DNA. Why wouldn't that completely eliminate it? Two questions. Why wouldn't that completely eliminate it, and did FDA approve both processes, both the process for the proof of principle as well as the process for production, or were they involved in the second part?

Kevin McKernan

I'll answer the second part first, which is that there was some discussion in the EMA. I don't know what's happened at the FDA, because we have less visibility there.

Brian Hooker

Sure.

Kevin McKernan

But there's some information at the EMA that I am superimposing on the FDA in Health Canada, because I think similar things may have occurred there. But at the EMA, they had an equivalency study that they were supposed to do, measuring 252 patients done with Process 1 and Process 2. And as best we can tell, that data was never matured and was never required for release. They asked of it, but when Pfizer couldn't produce it, they kind of looked the other way.

Brian Hooker

Okay.

Kevin McKernan

Josh has a good writeup on that on Twitter, and I'll point you to his work and Retsef Levi's work on this. But your first question, which is, "Why isn't the DNase killing this?", it comes down to, I think, two reasons. One, the way that they're measuring what's there has some blind spots. And the second thing is, they probably didn't anticipate that the modifications they made to the RNA inhibit the DNase from doing its job. So when they do this in vitro transcription reaction and they make this RNA, they put in a different nucleotide known as N1-Methylpseudouridine.

Brian Hooker

Right.

Kevin McKernan

This altered nucleotide is actually what really got the attention of the Nobel Prize. All right? They put in a different nucleotide so that the RNA was less labile to an RNase L that's in the human genome. The human body makes RNases that destroy RNA. The way RNA behaves is your DNA is like your hard drive, your RNA is like the task manager of all the programs that are opening and closing off that hard drive. The cell needs to have a system to not only turn a gene on, but to turn it off. If it can't turn it off, then you have a problem. The way a lot of these things get turned off is there are RNases that make sure that when a gene is expressed, it's only expressed for a certain period of time and it gets decayed. Well, they put in this other base that stops that process from happening, so that the RNA doesn't degrade as readily.

Mary

They put in something that turned off the off switch. Is that correct?

Kevin McKernan

Yeah. The RNA is harder to degrade, and they wanted that so they ensured they got production of spike protein long enough to matter. And there's a big debate as to whether it's too long right now, because we're finding these RNA stick around for way too long. They thought it was only 48 hours. People can sequence out of plasma. 28 days later, it's in breast milk now.

Brian Hooker

Right.

Kevin McKernan

So it's really a big train wreck, in my opinion. They didn't need that. But because of that base, that base also is published to radically change the melting temperature of DNA. That means that it's much stickier. It's much harder to peel apart from DNA. I think Callum Parr has a paper on this showing if you just put four of these nucleotides into 25 meric, it raises the temperature 9C, the melting temperature.

Brian Hooker

Oh my goodness.

Kevin McKernan

That's an enormous melting temperature shift for four bases of these things. That means that this RNA is extraordinarily sticky, and that means it's very likely that it's making RNA-DNA hybrids, that when the RNA polymerase is copying the RNA off the DNA, what you end up with is a triple helix. You end up with RNA kind of tangled up with DNA, and a nuclease doesn't know how to get rid of the DNA in that context. And this is really evident actually in Moderna's process. Moderna, if you look at our paper, there's a hundredfold more spike DNA contamination than the plasmid DNA, the backbone that doesn't have any RNA similarity. That's a real clear set sign that the nucleus can destroy the DNA that doesn't have any complimentary to RNA, but it can't destroy the DNA that has complimentary to the RNA that they're making. There's something I think they didn't see and anticipate. Because they changed the space, they didn't realize the enzymes they typically use to get rid of this contaminant are no longer functional. And so they now have to probably engineer different enzymes for this, and DNase XT is a good idea. Maybe T5. There's a host of these nucleases that might do a better job at this. But I think with the Warp Speed program, they didn't have time to really investigate this. That's one reason why the DNase is there. There's a second reason. The tools that you use to measure this differ based on the size of the DNA that's around. So if you use something like fluorometry, this is a tool that uses a dye that is an interpolating dye that binds to the minor groove of DNA. These tools will measure DNA as small as five to 10 bases. It just has to be complimentary at room temperature. That can be a 10-base pair piece of DNA you can get some SYBR Green study or signal from, or RiboGreen signal from. qPCR needs at least 100 bases to amplify, so all the DNA that's smaller than 100 bases, it can't see. So, they're using qPCR to monitor the DNA. They're using fluorimetry to measure the RNA. They're kind of playing some games there because they want to get really high RNA numbers and really low DNA numbers, because the EMA regulations aren't really a fixed amount of DNA. They're a ratio of how much RNA you have to how much DNA.

Mary

They're using two different processes to measure the DNA and the RNA. But if I understand you correctly, they could be using one process for both, or they could use both processes for both.

Kevin McKernan

Absolutely.

Mary

Is that correct?

Kevin McKernan

In fact, this-

Mary

And then you have more reliable data. Is that right?

Kevin McKernan

Yeah, that's absolutely right. And I think anyone who's familiar with these bench tools knows the fact that they're deviating this is a game, because they had to make PCR primers to measure the spike DNA and all they have to do is change the polymerase to measure the RNA, and they didn't do that. They opted to go get a whole nother assay with a different instrument, with a different fluorometry-based readout to measure the RNA. They bent over backwards to measure the RNA differently. They already had all the primers and tools they needed to measure it with the PCR assay they're using to measure the DNA. You just swap the polymerase out and you get the answer the same day.

Mary

This suggests gamesmanship, is that correct?

Kevin McKernan

Exactly. Intent to deceive.

Mary

Intent to deceive. Okay. Got it. And this data that you've uncovered has been replicated around the world. Is that right?

Kevin McKernan

Yes. Many labs now. We put the primers public on our Substack and in pre-prints, and now people can just order those from IDT and make their own primers. We have shipped also primer lots that we have here when people didn't want to wait for IDT to remake these. It can take IDT maybe a couple of weeks sometimes to make these, so when people urgently want them, we'll ship them vials of our primers. Philip Buckholtz has confirmed this work by using our primers down on vials in South Carolina. He also went on to do Oxford nanopore sequencing to confirm our work, just not to trust what we told him was working, was doing what our primers were doing. He said, "All right, your primers' clearly giving me signal on my vaccine lots. I'm now going to sequence them and make sure I can find the sequences of your primers inside my vials." And he went and did that and confirmed that the DNA that he actually has in his vials matches the primer sequences we gave him. Dr. Sin Lee did this at Milford Molecular with Sanger sequencing. He amplified. He made his own primers and amplified. He amplified some large fragments too, like 366 base pair fragments, to show that there's bigger fragments in there. And Sanger sequenced those to prove that it's in fact in the vials. And now the most recent study... I heard of one in Germany. I don't have the data from one in Germany, but Brigitte Konig claims to have found it in four vials out there as well. There's a group in Japan, Hiroshi Arakawa, I think, I may be fumbling his name, but they've been doing some work on this as well.They've reassembled our data and been looking at some PCR protocols. But the most recent one is out of David Speaker's work out in an Ontario where he's got the largest study to date. He went through 27 vials and he even did some XBB.1.5s and those still have the DNA in them. Now, there's two different methods that we used in the paper with David just to try to emulate what Pfizer's doing is we measured it with qPCR, in which case the DNA is under the limit on everything he looked at. A couple of them are getting really close to the line. That limit is somewhat arbitrary and we'll touch on that. Then he also measured it with fluorometry to show that they're like 100 foot over the line if you pick a different tool to really emphasize that this game of cherry-picking different methods is a racket and that you can get vastly different numbers if you measure this thing with different tools. But I think the interesting part of David's study is they took the vaccine lots, sorted them based on DNA quantity and then Jessica Rose dug into VAERS and showed that there are higher adverse events reported in VAERS, the lots that have higher amounts of DNA. Now it's a small dataset. There's a lot of confounders there. It's really just a hypothesis. We have to study more lots to make sure that there aren't other confounders that are skewing that association. But it does seem to line up with Philip's data. He has numbers that are over the limit and have high adverse events. We had numbers over the limit that have high adverse events. And there's another lot that was recorded in some EMA documentation, FL0007, that has really high adverse events and has really high DNA as well. So there's a couple other pieces of data that aren't in our paper because they were done at other laboratories that reconfirm, at least with Pfizer, more DNA is trending with more adverse events. We're not seeing that with Moderna, which is interesting. The correlation seems to go the other direction there, and they are doing a better job getting rid of it. They're probably at a log scale lower amounts of DNA, so they may be below the amount that matters and something else is driving their adverse events.

Brian Hooker

So now we've found and confirmed in several different labs including Phil Buckholtz’s labs and Sin Lee's labs. You've confirmed the presence of double-stranded DNA and in sizable quantities. I mean, we're talking about nanogram per milligram quantities or 100s of nanogram per milligram quantities of DNA. First of all, what are the implications of just having double-stranded DNA in those vials medically? And then second of all, what is in that DNA? I mean, what is hiding in that DNA? What elements do we need to be concerned about?

Kevin McKernan

Well, hiding is a good point because I do think there's been some intent to deceive here as well, particularly on Pfizer's behalf, if you were to take the DNA sequence, which apparently they did give the sequence to regulators, but they only annotated certain pieces of it and not others. And that's very bizarre because if you take their sequence and plug it into a standard software tool like SnapGene, it will annotate everything. So someone had to actively go and delete these annotations and then hand something to the regulators. And the piece that they deleted, I think is the most controversial piece. It's this SV40 promoter that is known to have a nuclear targeting sequence in this. This is a tandem repeat of 72 bases, about 144 bases in size, that binds transcription factors and drags any DNA attached to it into the nucleus.

Brian Hooker

This is an enhancer of the SV40 promoter? SV40 was used in... The SV40 or the promoter, but they never reported the enhancer's presence. Is that correct?

Kevin McKernan

They didn't report any of the SV40 components.

Brian Hooker

Wow.

Kevin McKernan

In fact, I can pull up what they did report here. So what you see on the right is what they presented to the EMA. I suspect this is what went to Health Canada as well. And they're somewhat shocked by this from the most recent email I saw from them. But you'll notice it annotates the spike protein, the ori, the kanamycin gene. It has this five base pair cut site down here that linearizes the plasmid. A couple other small pieces. If you take their sequence and just shove it into something known as SnapGene, it annotates all the stuff automatically over here. This SV40 just pops out. So I didn't find SV40. SnapGene found it by default.

Mary

I'm going to pull us back. So on the right, the ori and the kan R and the S protein, explain to us what is that showing us on the right and then what did they have to take out to get to what you showed us through SnapGene on the left?

Kevin McKernan

Okay. So the bacterial origin of replication is here in blue. So when you put this in E. coli, it will double with E. coli. It probably runs the copy number to 50 to 100 copies in the cell, and then the cells double every 30 minutes. So it's a great Xerox machine for DNA. But to make that happen in E. coli, you have to put a kanamycin resistance gene in there so that only the E. coli cells that have the plasmid survive. That way you knock out all the background. So this is the kanamycin gene. Now, this kanamycin gene won't work on its own. It needs a promoter that they've materially omitted here.

Brian Hooker

Omitted. Right.

Mary

Oh, interesting.

Kevin McKernan

That's missing-

Mary

So graph on the right seems very strange because that kanamycin wouldn't work without a promoter?

Kevin McKernan

Yep.

Brian Hooker

Correct.

Kevin McKernan

And the other thing about the SV40 promoter is it is active in mammalian cells and you really don't want mammalian promoters in any injectable. They don't need this because they have... If you look very carefully here, there's also an AmpR promoter that's kind of obscured over here in the left. That's what Moderna uses to drive the kanamycin gene. Pfizer has it too. They just happen to also have this mammalian promoter that is superfluous and shouldn't be there. And they know it because they deleted it from the annotation.

Mary

That's an intent to deceive? They actually are omitting that information?

Kevin McKernan

I believe so, because any annotation tool that annotated this plasmid that got down to T7 promoters, it found the bacterial origin, it found, I think this F1 origin down here, it would've found the SV40 origin. There's no reason-

Brian Hooker

So this was deleted. This was deleted.

Kevin McKernan

This was intentionally deleted.

Brian Hooker

Right. Right.

Mary

And let's just do a little background, gentlemen, on SV40. Maybe Brian, can you give us a little bit of background in the vaccine context of what SV40 really is? And then Kevin, we [inaudible] with you.

Brian Hooker

And Kevin, correct me if I'm wrong, but the SV40, simian virus 40, was an artifact of the polio vaccine, the oral, the live polio vaccine in the 1950s and 1960s, and it is oncogenic. SV40 itself as the virus is associated with certain tumors, certain forms of cancer, certain aggressive forms of cancer, and that it was a contaminant in the oral polio vaccine, the live virus polio vaccine, for many, many years. And so having these elements, including the SV40 promoter would in itself, I believe, would be oncogenic, and then that SV40 element, that 72 base pair element, has been shown to tie with other oncogenes in vivo and act as an enhancer, enhances its ability to form cancers.

Kevin McKernan

So I'm very new to SV40. I've been learning this just in this last year as to what's going on in the field. Now we don't have the whole SV40 virus, which is 5.2 kilobases. We have about 420 bases or so of it, which consists of four pieces. We have the SV40 origin, the promoter, the enhancer and the poly(A) signal that are in there. SV40, I think instructs it to put a poly(A) signal on a messenger RNA. For some reason that's sitting in the vector as well. I haven't studied as much on what the poly(A) signal, why they need the poly(A) signal in this vector. That seems to be... I think that's needed... If they want to express these plasmids of mammalian cells, it's good to have something that puts a poly(A) signal on it. And so I think they put that on the F1 origin for other reasons. So that being said, a lot of pushback is, "Hey. This doesn't have the T antigen. The tumor antigen is what is deemed to be the carcinogen in SV40. And so you guys are conflating SV40 with the virus and you're spreading fear porn and all that." But I think an important thing to know is that a large portion of the population is SV40 positive from the polio vaccine. So they presumably can make T antigen. And why is that important? Well, T antigen is what actually initiates the DNA replication on the SV40 promoter that's in the vaccine. So if a certain part of the population makes T antigen and you inject them with a lot of these promoters, they're going to have the machinery to turn that promoter on wherever it lands. So there's-

Brian Hooker

In other words, if-

Kevin McKernan

We don't know the implications of this.

Brian Hooker

Right. Right. In other words, if you've been vaccinated with the oral polio or the live virus polio vaccine, then essentially you could have the T antigen already in you.

Kevin McKernan

Right. Right. And that's something that I can't really... I think right now we have data here that shows there's a legal problem here, more so than we have evidence of a clinical problem. The clinical problem, we still need more data from. We need to find out if this DNA is actually in other people post-vaccination and people who haven't been vaccinated to see is it associated with a lot of this adverse events. Right now, this is just hypothesis generation. We don't really have it. We have a lot of reasons to believe this is a bad idea. They don't need this DNA in there. They didn't tell the regulators about it. And it's inside of an LNP and it's going to get to the nucleus space and the sequence that's in there. So all of that is a train wreck. If you're putting in 200 billion of these molecules per shot and you're doing them five times a year... I don't know how many times people are taking them, but if you think of your schedule, you should be past your fifth by now. So there's a cumulative dosing problem here. There's a high number of these fragments in there. Even though the nanograms might seem low, the fragmentation of them makes them like buckshot and makes them much more potent as integration tools because you have more active ends of DNA. It's the ends of the DNA that have phosphates and hydroxyls on them that make them sticky. Those are kind of like the Lego pieces of DNA, if you will. So you'll see an FDA documentation on guidance documents that look at DNA, that they base these nanogram limits based on genomic DNA. 10 nanograms of genomic DNA might be like 1200 copies of DNA, but we're dealing with really small pieces, which means we have 100s of billions of these pieces. And they even allude to the fact that if you were dealing with not mammalian cell contamination, which would be 3 gigabase genomes, but you're dealing with viruses, well, then the copy number is so damn high that you might need femtogram or attogram limits on the amount of DNA that could be around. There's other guidance documents that also speak to the fact that the 200 base paired limit is maybe not really pertinent if you're dealing with promoters. Maybe it should be down at seven bases, because seven bases could integrate and cause problems even in a VDJ circumstance with certain parts of the genome. So there are guidance documents that need nuance and conceptualization and contextualization. They put out guidance documents before LNPs were round saying, "We think there's going to be mammalian cell DNA. We can tolerate this much of it based on this copy number based on us not knowing much about it," but the moment you start getting into high copy number contaminants that have bioactive elements to them and they're inside LNPs, the whole game changes. And-

Brian Hooker

It's really astounding. When you look at these genomic insertion events, and I've done genetic engineering before, primarily in genetically modified plants and bacteria, it's like you're going to Vegas. You're looking for the one in a million event, but there are enough errant strands of DNA around there for that to actually happen. Is that correct?

Kevin McKernan

Yeah. Philip Buckholt put up an interesting paper on his Twitter recently about the rate when you get a million transfection like this, the rate of cells that stably integrate was like seven... It was down below 7%, but 7% is a huge number when you're dealing with billions of LMPs.

Brian Hooker

Right.

Kevin McKernan

So this is-

Mary

LMP is lipid nanoparticle, is that right, Kevin?

Kevin McKernan

That's right, yeah. These are packaged in these LMPs. We know that. That was part of our most recent papers. If you use a nuclease on the vaccine, it won't get rid of the DNA that's there because it's protected. It's inside this lipid nanoparticle. The guidance documents the FDA have for DNA contamination, they're just ancient relics. They're outdated. They actually started before the NCVIA, which is this National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. They were at 10 picograms back then. After that act, they went up a thousand-fold over the course of 10 years. We're now at the stage where we've tolerated a thousand times higher. Now we're switching to LMPs that bring these things directly into cells with nuclear targeting sequences.

Brian Hooker

We were told that this would not target the nucleus. We were told that this would not enter into the nucleus. Is the nuclear targeting sequence, is that the SV40 enhancer?

Kevin McKernan

That is. It's been published as a great gene therapy tool because it's so effective at bringing things to the nucleus in hours. David Dean has great work on this, and Health Canada has just admitted that they found it. It's in the vaccine. All these arguments about our vials are from dumpsters and everything, Pfizer gave sequence to Health Canada that has it in there so there's no more argument of it being in there.

Mary

Let's move to the legal issue that you flagged for us, Kevin. Health Canada has acknowledged that this DNA contamination is in the vials. We now have a major government of the world acknowledging this, and Children's Health Defense on Friday last week, published a story quoting Health Canada as saying, "Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid such as an SV40 enhancer at the time of submission." But we know that that didn't happen. To your mind, as a scientist who's long been involved in this area, should that be enough to now force all of the governments around the world to take these vials off the market until they've been investigated?

Kevin McKernan

I would think so. If they don't do this, what are they there for? This is like every time someone breaks a rule, they just change the rule. What do we need regulators for if they're not going to stick to these rules and guidelines they put forward? Now, unfortunately, in the same breadth of that email, I think they reiterated the safe and effective psalm. Like, okay-

Mary

They did, but that's nonsense as people say. They say the risk benefit profile continues to support the use, but if they didn't know this and they don't acknowledge it, then how could they assess the risk benefit profile? That seems just nonsensical.

Kevin McKernan

It's circular. It's very circular for them to state that, that you don't actually... I mean, an important point to that risk. They waived the genome toxicity studies in the trial so how can they know risk?

Brian Hooker

Right. They did. They don't know that there's risk because the trials were never done. How can you get away with... It seemed like when you look at the plasmid submission to the FDA, there are unknown sequences. There are big black boxes. There's a big unknown where the SV40 promoter went. Why did they tolerate this in the first place?

Kevin McKernan

I don't know because there's other things in that sequence. There's other points in that sequence that should have rung alarm bells. If you turn on any sort of ORF finding tool, so to paint where the open reading frames are, you can identify where the spike is. But the thing that will blow your mind is that there's an ORF on the reverse strand of the spike that is 252 amino acids long. That should have been a red flag. That tells me that no one opened this in a tool. They got the sequence and probably just said, "Pay your user fee and we'll put it in a file and move on." What an ORF finder does is it looks for open reading frames. If you turn it on, it will look for start codons and stop codons and it instantly finds the spike protein. If you ask this to look on both strands of the DNA, it will find another ORF that runs the entire direction on the other strand of the spike protein for 1,252 amino acids long. I don't have it visualized here because I picked up the wrong screen here, but I do have it on my substack and people can see this. Now, anyone who is regulating this should have put this into a tool like SnapGene to say, "Show me what's in this plasmid," and it annotates all these pieces for you. It would've shown you that there is a mysterious ORF of unknown origin that encodes the entire opposite strand of the spike protein. What the hell is that? Why is it there? Moderna doesn't have it. The virus doesn't have it.

Mary

It's unknown? They don't know what it is?

Kevin McKernan

Unknown. I mean, I've blasted this thing against NCB, I didn't get many hits. The only hits I can find it in UniProt are to a gene or protein that's in silk and in collagen and in some other fibroin thing. I don't know what this does, but I know that this is an artifact of their codon optimization that should not be there and is a massive risk and they should get rid of it because it's actually a massive Sudoku puzzle for someone to actually figure this out. How do you get a 1,273 amino acid open reading frame at one strand and how do you get one on the other that doesn't have a stop codon anywhere? It seems like a computation.

Mary

Wow, that's very…

Brian Hooker

What are the implications of having that ORF going in the opposite direction and then injecting that into humans?

Kevin McKernan

I don't know if it's going to get expressed. That's the thing, is that this [inaudible] answer is a bi-directional promoter. Presumably, it makes RNA in both directions. If for some reason it spans this polyA region in the plasmid, it could go and start making RNA over that unknown, that mysterious ORF. I don't know what that's going to do in the cell. I don't know if there's a Kozak consensus sequence there. It's very difficult to informationally screen for internal ribosomal entry sites so I can't tell you that the ribosome is definitely going to translate this thing. But I can certainly tell you that if I were a regulator, I would tell them to get rid of it because it's risk with no gain and it's unnecessary.

Brian Hooker

Do you think they really even look at this?

Mary

Sorry, [inaudible]-

Kevin McKernan

There's no way they did. If they looked at this, this would've rung out to them and likewise, the SV40 omission would've rung out to them. So it's clear to me they didn't look. I think they collected their user fee and put the thing in the file.

Mary

So the regulators were asleep on the job. It sounds like what you're saying because they didn't catch SV40 that they could have easily caught through SnapGene and they also didn't tell us about this open reading frame 1,237 base pairs. Is that right?

Kevin McKernan

Yeah. The open reading frame is 1,273 for the spike, and on the reverse side there's a 1,252 amino acid open reading frame. I could see someone writing it off being like, "Oh, it's Messenger RNA, it's going to be single stranded. The reverse strand won't be there when it's in RNA form." But they didn't anticipate the DNA is going to come with it. Now we have both strands there and the other strand codes for something. If any of this stuff integrates, it's likely to be an open reading frame of a foreign peptide that your immune system's not going to like. The point is it's a very open reading frame rich plasmid. There's not a lot of stop codons.

Brian Hooker

We've got millions and millions of lipid nanoparticles that are floating around physiologically and basically, the lipid nanoparticles contain what appears to be transfection soup. How do people not get transfected by this?

Kevin McKernan

I think the numbers are probably in the billions to trillions from what I've read on the LMPs, which is a large number. Yeah, they probably have the RNA and the DNA in them from the measurements we've made. They're packaged, and their nucleus resistant and they're ending up in cells. Now, what a lot of people push back is like, "Okay, any cell that gets transfected is going to die, so who cares if this car goes in there?" But that's not really true because we see this spike protein and the spike sequence persisting at least 28 days. People have sequenced mRNA or DNA, we don't know which one it was, but they got sequence of the vaccine 28 days later in plasmid. They have found it in breast milk five or seven days later. The protein itself, they have found, Patterson found it four months later on exosomes, I think. Sorry, that was Bancel. Patterson found it like I think 200 days later in macrophages. So something is persisting, and I don't think every cell that gets transformed is a 100% killed instantly. There's something going on where people can't clear this and maybe it's hitting immune privileged cells, and that's why it sits around forever. I think it is a risk if there's DNA floating around, it's going to add to the persistence of this 'cause it could integrate and continually express these other foreign peptides.

Brian Hooker

Exactly, and what about the implications? When I think of DNA disrepair, I think of cancer, and so I get very, very concerned about that. Just not specifically on, "Oh, we're making people into genomically stable spike protein production factories," but also just the other bits and pieces of DNA that are getting integrated into the genome, and what are they doing? What are they enhancing or what are they silencing?

Kevin McKernan

Well, what made me nervous is when we saw... So Philip's work, I think showed a couple billion of the amplicons from just PCR. PCR measures a hundred base per amplicon. We have one that actually targets the SV40 promoter. If there's a billion copies of just that region in every injection, that's carpet bombing a genome with a billion promoters. Where those land and what efficiency is an open debate, but wherever they land, they're going to be active promoters of a million cells. I think that alone is an issue because you're just dropping these things that make RNA into the genome randomly, and if you happen to put one on a proto-oncogene, a host of issues. Now there's other areas…There are genes that if you hyper express them, they can drive to excess cell growth. They call them proto-oncogenes. If you put an active promoter in front of that, it turns out it's not good. The other thing that can happen is you can break a gene that slows down cancer like P53. P53 and BRCA are these DNA repair enzymes, and if you happen to put a different part of the plasmid inside of those, it could disable those-

Brian Hooker

Disrupts them, yes.

Kevin McKernan

... then you don't have this repair mechanism that you need. Now, most people have two copies of all these genes. So many people you break one of them, maybe okay. But there are subsets of people that have BRCA mutations and P53 mutations and they're haploid, so they have one bad copy and one good copy. You come in with this vaccine, you can knock out the only other good copy. There's a whole host of rare genetics that you have to consider in this, and perhaps why this may not be something you'd be seeing in all patients. There's another dimension of which vaccine lots have more of this versus less of this, like the Schmeling paper you look at has 4% of the vaccine lots having, I don't know, the majority of the adverse events. We have a lot of Venn diagrams here of things to consider. There's a lot of people who probably took these and don't have any harm at all. There's maybe a subset of people that take these bad lots that in fact have some genetic reason why they're more susceptible to the harm than others.

Mary

Kevin, you've mentioned I think today and in the past that this promoter, the SV40 promoter in particular, is used in gene therapy, and yet this was not reviewed as a gene therapy, it was reviewed as a vaccine. Is that an issue in your view?

Kevin McKernan

Yeah, I think that is actually a very serious legal issue. This here is the SV40 enhancer that is published to bind all of these transcription factors and drag this sequence into the nucleus. There's two of these copies of these 72 base pair pieces of DNA. And this is what they're putting on plasmids to get them to do perform gene therapy. So the sequence that they omitted is a bioactive sequence according to Health Canada, and it is used in gene therapy. There's just no debate anymore. The plasmids that are in there are gene therapy tools, and they're injected into billions of people.

Mary

So not only was there no informed consent for anybody, and this was emergency use authorization, so, by law, they weren't able to give truly informed consent, but it looks like this was a gene therapy, and people were not told that this was a gene therapy. Is that right?

Kevin McKernan

That's right. And now, they may not have meant for it to be this, but they certainly, in my opinion, hid it. The fact that that SV40 region is the only origin missing on the vector means whoever ran the annotation program there probably had three origins show up, the F1, the bacterial, and the SV40, and decided to remove the SV40 because it was an unpopular name, and they knew it was controversial.

Brian Hooker

Incredible.

Mary

There's a long literature in mainstream scientific journals about SV40. Isn't that right, Brian?

Brian Hooker

Absolutely. It's such a strong promoter, and it's a mammalian active promoter. And so you would expect, if you put that promoter and especially if you have that 72 base pair enhancer region, that you're basically... You've got a nuclear localization signal, and so that is its job. It basically will take the DNA sequence behind it, and it will deliver it into the nucleus. It's absolutely incredible that this is there. It's absolutely incredible this whole thing was hidden from view. Wouldn’t that raise…Again, maybe I'm beating a dead horse, but just the absence of that information, wouldn't that raise some type of red flag with the EMA and the FDA?

Kevin McKernan

You would hope so, that they would feel deceived by this. That this is not something that it's clearly in their rules that you need to declare these things, and now they find out years later that they weren't shared this information. So I-

Brian Hooker

So, you've been…Right, right. You've been looking at this for quite a while now, Kevin. And so if you don't like the message, you shoot the messenger. So what's happening with you?

Kevin McKernan

Oh, well, I've already been character assassinated for my choice to get into the cannabis field, so I'm kind of bulletproof from that standpoint.

Brian Hooker

That's almost as bad as looking at vaccines in general, so yes.

Kevin McKernan

Yeah, exactly, yeah.

Mary

Well, Kevin helped us in the past. I want to point out that Kevin generously gave us a declaration in a case that we filed against coercive PCR testing of children in New York City schools, and we're very grateful for that. So you're not worried about the character assassination that goes along with this, Kevin?

Kevin McKernan

No, they already assassinated my character a decade ago when I decided to start studying cannabis. So they'll continue on that front. And yeah, we get harassed on Twitter and all the usual social media nonsense, but I don't think this is... I don't think it's very effective. It oftentimes, I think, has the reverse effect, as people see who they're attacking. And you can see our pre-print on Thursday's got like 72,000 downloads now, probably because the Streisand effect of everyone who's hating on us on Twitter.

Mary

What's your Substack, so that we can have everybody follow you on it?

Kevin McKernan

It's named after the active compound in catnip. I'm a cat person, so nepetalactone. So, it's unfortunately really horrible to tell somebody in order to spell, but lactone is the last word. If you ever get confused, just look up the active ingredient in catnip, and it will give you that long-winded name. I taught people how to take the Pfizer sequence as if they were given it as if they worked at the EMA or Health Canada. This is the tool that you would probably use to open it up and look at it. This is called SnapGene. It's a free tool. Download it, open the file, and it will instantly paint you the SV40 regions. So this shows you that someone had to go in and actively delete this because the standard tools in the industry paint this thing. So, I don't get credit for finding SV40. SnapGene found it. It painted it the first time I loaded the sequence in, which is why I was really confused to see that it was not in Pfizer's plasmid map 'cause that told me somebody had to go erase it. That's not an, "Oops, I forgot it." That's a "I clearly wanted to deceive you" type of move.

Brian Hooker

Right.

Kevin McKernan

And this is just a picture of that second origin [inaudible] is going the opposite direction. And teaches people how to go and look for these yourselves and some of the genes that that thing hits. They're not really strong hits, but I'm like, "This is really weird." It's a protein in silk that shows-

Brian Hooker

Oh my goodness. It is. It is a protein in silk. And these intervening sequences, these SV40 sequences, it's not just you. It's Health Canada now, right?

Kevin McKernan

Yeah, they confirmed in that email that "Yes, we were given the sequence from the plasmid, but we were not specifically annotated the SV40 that was in that sequence." They annotated all those other pieces and just decided to not tell them about the SV40 in the sequence.

Brian Hooker

But they have the sequence itself-

Kevin McKernan

... a huge in a page in there, and not telling them that you slipped something in there.

Brian Hooker

So they have the sequence themselves. They can run SnapGene just like anybody else.

Kevin McKernan

In theory. I suspect that they did until we published our work.

Brian Hooker

Right. Oopsie.

Mary

You've identified for us, Kevin, that the FDA and Health Canada and the EMA potentially could allege that they were deceived, and perhaps they were deceived, and that perhaps opens the door for them, right now, to take much more dramatic action.

Kevin McKernan

I think that's fair because if you look through the volume of data that Pfizer's handing over, it's almost this drown the regulator in material, so they can't possibly read it all. And that's really easy to do with sequence information. You hand them a file of 7,800 bases, and unless they have the time to set someone aside and say, "Annotate this and look at this and tell me if there's anything weird in it"... They're then also buried in all the PCR data, all the LPS data. Pfizer even went out and engineered a new mass spec method of DNA sequencing to try to show them that their Poly(A) signals in the vaccine were the right length. They did all of this work that I thought was fairly unnecessary and looked like a tactic of drowning regulators in data, that that's probably what's occurring here.

Mary

They snowed them. Well, this is incredibly enlightening. Kevin, thank you so much for taking the time to explain this to us. I certainly have a much clearer picture, and we can send people to your catnip, nepetalactone. Is that right? Newsletter to get all the latest and look at it in greater detail. Again, thank you both so much for doing this.

Brian Hooker

Thank you. Thank you so much, Kevin, and we look forward to your further research.

Kevin McKernan

Thank you for having us to get the word out.

West Seemiller, a member of the LGBT community, has taken a strong stance against vaccine passports in West Hollywood. He views bodily autonomy as analogous to the right to choose whether or not to get vaccinated. Today, on ‘Good Morning CHD,’ West joins host Michael Kane for a conversation on diversity, segregation, inclusion and finding truth in the midst of media lies. Watch the video on CHD.TV!

In this episode of ‘This Week’: Vaccine stocks plummet, pregnant women’s vaccine hesitancy rises, the FDA finds ‘safety signal’ of seizures in 2-5 year olds who received the COVID vaccine and more! Be sure to tune in!

Today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ guest, Sam Husseini, is no stranger to the media establishment. His experience as a journalist whose work has been featured in renowned publications has not only served to threaten the mainstream narratives of various major events but also put him in a valuable position to question and report on recent affairs. In this episode, Sam and Alexis Baden-Mayer dig deep into the origins of COVID-19 and biowarfare throughout history — and they don’t hold back.

Zen Honeycutt of Moms Across America presents her team’s ‘shocking’ findings in testing school lunches and America’s top twenty fast food brands. The results are disturbing. Watch the episode on CHD.TV!

“You can’t understand the control grid without understanding the role of space.” Digital currency, blockchain, and tokenization require an endless supply of power to run. What if you had the ability to construct the central operation center for the entire control grid from a location with no real jurisdiction and no accessibility or oversight? Investigative journalist Corey Lynn returns to ‘Financial Rebellion’ to discuss her new jaw-dropping exposé.

Viewers, don’t miss this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD,’ featuring research scientists, attorneys and a clinical trial whistleblower who share mind-boggling insights into the legal affairs and physical implications of the COVID-19 immunization campaign. They do a deep-dive into the manufacturing processes and laboratory studies relating to these shots while also pointing out the observable effects of their rollout. Tune in!

A lawsuit, challenging the Los Angeles Unified School District vaccine mandate, has new developments. Leslie Manookian and Soni Lloyd appear on ‘Good Morning CHD’ to share the details of this case and explain how, for the persistent existence of COVID pandemic policies, it may have significant ramifications. Watch the episode on CHD.TV!

Tammy Kattner, today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ guest, has experience as a homeschooling mom who chose to pursue an alternative education for her children. At her farm, which brings in hundreds of students each semester, Tammy teaches kids gardening, food sourcing, sustainability and nature skills. Learn how she got started and what she has learned along the way by tuning into the episode on CHD.TV!

In this episode of ‘This Week’: “Horrific” coercion of military members, DNA damage from mRNA products, allergy shots, new vaccines, “We have to be skeptical” and more. Watch this, and other shows, on CHD.TV.

Tune in to ‘Good Morning CHD’ to hear a panel discussion on the structures that affect the past, present and future victims of vaccine injury. They begin in the early 1980s, with the mechanisms that laid the groundwork to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Then, the conversation shifts to explain, in more depth, the impact of this act and its relationship to the liability, marketing and compensation of childhood immunizations. Finally, viewers learn the significance of this framework on the contemporary and impending medical products used by people of all ages. This is an episode that you won’t want to miss!

Mike Donio, M.S. lost his job as a biotechnology research scientist because he chose to opt out of the COVID shot mandate. In this week’s ‘Doctors & Scientists,’ he shares his insights on modified mRNA technology and DNA contamination by harkening back to his experience in clinical trials and education. Viewers, tune in!

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts talk all things pandemic propaganda on this week’s ‘Financial Rebellion’ episode. Find out how, even before the COVID-19 debacle, emergency powers may have been used and abused by vaccine manufacturers and those in power. Dr. Wodarg brings to light various protocols — testing, treatments, vaccination — and how these were portrayed by the media and utilized by healthcare professionals across the globe. Don’t miss this eye-opening conversation!

What is the weapon of “misplaced trust” that Vera Sharav discusses during her interview on the CHD Bus? Vera has spoken out about the COVID pandemic protocols and the holocaust as they relate to masking, doctors, technology and the vulnerable population. Her warnings in this video may just shock you to the core. Find more content, featuring Vera Sharav, on CHD.TV.

Michael Kane interviews retired NYPD lieutenant John Macari on ‘Good Morning CHD’ today. John has been outspoken about vaccine mandates ever since facing pushback for taking a personal stance against the COVID shots as a first responder. Hear about his advocacy work in New York and beyond by tuning in to the episode on CHD.TV!

Meet Steve Solomon — Principal Legal Officer at the WHO. After it was revealed at the fifth meeting of the WGIHR that the group would be unable to meet their deadline, Solomon stepped in to reinterpret article 55 in what appears to be an attempt to PREVENT the public from seeing the amendments before they are passed. Are these ‘negotiations’ on the IHR amendments and pandemic accord really just smokescreen and theater, designed to placate the public into thinking there is some sort of democratic process in place — as the digital biosecurity state is already being built up around us? Dr. Meryl Nass, James Corbett, and James Roguski peel back the lies and warn us why it’s time to start paying attention. Tune in!

Tune in to this weekly CHD.TV show for a run-down of relevant stories from the news. In this episode, learn about outbreak surveillance funding, combination shots, the censorship regime, mRNA technology inventions and more. Don’t miss it!

Ken Drysdale, FEC, P.Eng., author of the 89 page "Investigation into Criminal Allegations Concerning Covid-19 Pandemic Response”, and commissioner of the National Citizen’s Inquiry joins Canadian doctors Malthouse, Shaw and Hoffe to discuss the approval of Moderna’s COVID booster for infants despite lacking longterm safety evidence and the further threats of medical experimentation our children face today. Tune in!

This is a truly shocking ‘Doctors & Scientists’ interview with Dr. Jessica Rose. Find out what the vaccine contamination commotion is about among scientists by tuning in to the episode! Dr. Rose answers pivotal questions about this relevant topic, including the following: what researchers are finding in the COVID-19 shot vials, who is behind the manufacturing of these products and how cancer is involved.

“We have to push back for freedom,” Catherine Austin Fitts states, today, on ‘Financial Rebellion.’ In this episode, Catherine and Carolyn recap a Scandinavian freedom event, sharing its main takeaways, the speaker lineup and more. What is the “mass atrocity” we face in our present world? What is the role of trust in building relationships and creating alternative systems? Watch to find out!

Beyond environmental concerns for all living creatures, how do smart cities impact the lives of humans in particular — their privacy and other rights? Joining host Kim Mack Rosenberg, attorneys Glaser and McCollough lay out the details of the tech rollouts taking place across the globe, on ‘Good Morning CHD,’ today. Viewers, don’t miss this crucial discussion!

Investigative journalist Derrick Broze had a discussion with Dr. Peter Hotez about science. Today, he appears on ‘Good Morning CHD’ to share the details. But first, hear updates from the news with host Michael Kane and watch a clip from the heated interview between Broze and Dr. Hotez. Tune in!

How safe and effective are the things we put in and around our bodies? Are phones tested adequately for radiation levels? Do psychiatric medications prevent violence? Find out more about these critical topics in today’s episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’

Catch the latest with Mary Holland and Polly Tommey on CHD.TV’s ‘This Week.’ In today’s episode, Mary and Polly cover news on brain tumors and pesticides, healthcare worker mandates, social media censorship and more. Be sure to watch!

In this ‘Good Morning CHD’ episode, learn about school-based health clinics, the services they plan to offer and how parents can get involved in the decisions being made in the education system. This, and more, on CHD.TV!

Watch ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week to hear from Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., whose study analyzes the relationship between all-cause mortality and the COVID injection rollout. One of the things that the researchers found was that the all-cause mortality rates levels were undetectable in multiple countries prior to the vaccine and boosters were made available. What else was uncovered in the study? Tune in to find out!

Could the US student loan debt crisis be a highly orchestrated scam? Why has congress removed nearly every fundamental consumer protection from student loans? Alan Collinge, founder of Student Loan Justice joins to discuss his fiercely non-partisan fight to cancel federal student loans and return bankruptcy rights to all student loans.

In this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD,’ watch a conversation between Mary Holland and Steve Miller as they discuss the eye-opening ‘COVID Unmasked’ series. But first, hear from Polly Tommey and Dr. Paul Thomas as the report in from the CHD Bus.

Catch the details on relevant, health-related legal cases with Michael Kane and his guest attorney Sujata Gibson in today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ episode. Watch to the end to find out who is impacted by these lawsuits and ways to get involved in fighting for medical freedom.

Viewers, are you aware of the prevalence and implications of the modern globalist agenda and its history? Two guests, on ‘Good Morning CHD’ today, lay out the important information you need to know about the push for worldwide control under the guise of ‘health.’ Watch this eye-opening episode for the details!

“The federal government has never, ever done a true vaccinated versus unvaccinated study.” — and that is why Dr. Brian Hooker wrote the book featured in this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’ In conjunction with CHD’s chairman on leave, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Hooker compiled over a hundred studies relating to human health based on immunization status. Discover more details about their groundbreaking findings in the interview, and order your own copy of ‘Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak’ today!

Viewers, do you want to know more about spike proteins? Then don’t miss this in-depth discussion on ‘Doctors & Scientists’ with Dr. Hooker and his guest, J.J. Couey, Ph.D. They dive into the relationship between COVID mRNA technology and biodistribution, research studies, immune responses and more. Watch the eye-opening episode on CHD.TV!

Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts return to answer YOUR questions for Part IV of Your Bankers: Finding a Relationship With a Great Bank. But first, hear from Dr. Meryl Nass on case updates and catch the trio in Stockholm at the On Guard for the Liberty of Mankind event. Hear about the G20 Summit, UN Climate Week, Bloomberg meetings and what this means for the reformation of the world's financial system on today's ‘Good Morning CHD’!

When a narrative was sent to the Maine medical board in late 2021 claiming that Dr. Meryl Nass was spreading unidentified COVID misinformation, an immediate suspension to her license would mark the beginning of a long and arduous battle for truth, justice and life-saving treatments. The verdict? Watch to find out.

Today’s episode of ‘Good Morning CHD’ is one that viewers won’t want to miss. Host Michael Kane shares a legal update on various cases related to medical mandates, censorship, license suspension and more. His guest, Bobbie Anne Cox, is an attorney who is dealing with quarantine camp litigation in New York. Find out more by tuning in!

In this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD,’ a panel of three doctors discuss the detrimental effect screen time has on young people. Tune in on CHD.TV to find out more!

COVID boosters, shots in pregnancy, hospital protocols, censorship and more — today’s ‘This Week’ with Mary and Polly is one that viewers won’t want to miss. In this episode: CDC recommends more shots, California threatens to defund schools, a smartphone tool pushes HPV and social media censors free speech. Watch for the details!

In 2010, school-based health centers were authorized. But the laws related to these clinics go back even farther. Theresa Wrangham lays out the information parents need to know about their rights and privacy when it comes to their children’s education in this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’ Tune in!

Today, on ‘Doctors & Scientists,’ Pierre Kory, MD, MPA and Brian Hooker, Ph.D. talk about all things health and COVID — variants, alternative treatments, repurposed drugs, new boosters and more. Also, Dr. Kory exposes “misleading” claims from the FDA and CDC about Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, ‘sovereign immunity’ and the impact of denying care to patients during the pandemic.

Today, Mary Holland and Polly Tommey look into the latest on masking, COVID variants, rabies and more. Viewers won't want to miss this exciting episode of ‘This Week’ on CHD.TV!

James Corbett interviews Dr. Meryl Nass on her acclaimed new connect-the-dots article exposing how the WHO’s proposed treaty will increase man-made pandemics. Learn how cataclysmic lab escapes become increasingly inevitable in a science fiction futurescape where 94+ countries are “incentivized and encouraged” to perform gain-of-function experiments and to share their weaponized genomic sequences with member states through a vast new “biodefense” surveillance network.

Find out the truth about RSV on ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week, as two doctors discuss the science related to this virus and its immunization agenda. Dr. Meryl Nass shares a presentation with viewers for straightforward, clear-cut information on this topic — don’t miss it!

Viewers, tune in to ‘Financial Rebellion’ this week to listen to a discussion about banking and learn the value of taking a more active role in your financial pursuits. In this episode, Catherine Austin Fitts and Carolyn Betts explain ways to evaluate banks based on rating systems, call reports, mortgage loans, investment interest, risk profiles and more. Watch it on CHD.TV!

The VICP program has roots in the 1980s, when lawsuits arose concerning the DPT shot and brain injury. From this sprouted up a 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. According to attorney Hazlehurst, one of today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ guests, ”The Vaccine Act has succeeded wildly at protecting the pharmaceutical industry and has failed miserably at compensating vaccine-injured children.” Watch the episode on CHD.TV!

‘What about Polio?’ many parents ask, in speaking of choices surrounding the issue of childhood vaccination. News campaigns contribute to the fear-based pressure to immunize or otherwise face the threat of paralysis. But people on the ground are proclaiming a different narrative, that their vaccinated children suffered severe injury after their shots. Now, these parents appear on the CHD Bus to share their stories, warn others of the potential dangers of immunization and speak to the importance of informed consent. Watch the full clip on CHD.TV.

• What role do parents play in their children’s education? Join Michael Kane and his guest on ‘Good Morning CHD’ for a conversation about taking learning to a level of intimacy and intentionality. Find out how homeschooling is possible and why parents might want to consider it for their own families.

“Every parent homeschools,” according to ‘Good Morning CHD’ guest Andrew Pudewa. Tune in to this episode to sink your toes into homeschooling curriculum and the value of literacy with Sarah Kenoyer and Andrew.

With the FDA’s approval of a generic version of Vyvanse, popular ADHD drug for ages 6 and up, Brian Hooker, Ph.D. joins to discuss the astonishing 20X increase in ADHD he uncovered in his book ‘Vax-Unvax: Let The Science Speak.’ CHD President Mary Holland closes the show with a heroic ‘We Are Winning’ presentation given in Kansas City at the Freedom Revival in the Heartland Event hosted by Kansans for Health Freedom. Don't miss it!

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg returns with Dr. Meryl Nass to discuss the “brutal, criminal corruption” and misuse of fear propaganda in the wake of false pandemics for the purpose of private gain. Dr. Wodarg is a multiple specialist, epidemiologist and longstanding health politician. For many years he has been at the forefront against corruption in healthcare and science. His successful fight against the ‘swine flu’ business, which was jointly arranged by the vaccine industry and the World Health Organization, attracted worldwide attention. His medical and political experience makes it easier for him to look behind the scenes, to understand connections, to recognize campaigns and manipulations by Big Pharma and their investors, and to realistically assess dangers. As a vigilant doctor, in February 2020 he opened resistance to the corona scaremongering.

Pregnancy and immunization are the topics at hand in this week’s discussion on ‘Doctors & Scientists’ with Brian Hooker, Ph.D. and his guest, James Thorp, M.D. Viewers, tune in for a break-down of shocking data on “disastrous” and “unconscionable” campaigns for mothers carrying infants to get vaccinated in what Thorp describes as the “covenant of death.”

What will the impact of BRICS-11+ be on our lives? On the economy? On the US Dollar? Is the East vs. West paradigm an illusion to obfuscate the real enemy, the multinational corporations who seek to control over the financial system? Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, Executive Director of CHD Africa joins attorney Carolyn Betts to discuss the “The Predatory Class’s” untold incentives for UN/WHO supranational centralization.

“The response is puzzling” — death count reporting, disaster assistance support, warning siren deactivation and more. As Maui burns, the government fails to supply sufficient aid to its people, according to the coverage provided by today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’ guest, Jeremy Loffredo. Watch the episode for the details.

Around us, we bear witness to the rapid assembly of a digital biometric security state, increasingly apparent in airports and stadiums, where new facial recognition technology and high tech infrastructure is being rolled out at the expense of individual freedoms. CHD Attorney and digital privacy expert Greg Glaser joins ‘Good Morning CHD’ to discuss.

What are school-based health centers? Stand for Health Freedom advocates peel away the layers of deception surrounding this effort in schools across the nation on ‘Good Morning CHD’ today. Tune in on CHD.TV!

Catch the latest health-related news from Mary Holland and Polly Tommey in this episode of ‘This Week.’ They provide feedback on major news articles and press releases, including on digital health, vaccinations, medical mandates, school closures and more. Don’t miss it!

“It’s changed everything” — for Timothy McAdams, getting the COVID shot meant permanent damage to both his health and career. Hear his story on ‘Good Morning CHD’ today. But first, hear from Polly at the Kansas CHD Bus event. Viewers won’t want to miss it!

Mike Koehler joins ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week to tell the story of his son, who was given MiraLAX as a therapy for gut issues. However, the use of this medication began to rear its ugly head after Mike’s son began having seizures and other adverse events. In this ‘Doctors & Scientists’ episode, viewers learn about the prevalence of, and harms wrought by, polyethylene glycol (PEG) in our environments. Tune in!

Learn about European Union censorship efforts with Taylor Hudak and Carolyn Betts, today, on ‘Financial Rebellion.’ They update viewers on the fight against media narratives and collusion and disclose the power structures behind the suppression. Be sure to watch!

Viewers hear the tragic story of Maurice Mouille’s vaccine injury, today, on ‘Good Morning CHD.’ But first, Polly and the time report live from the CHD Bus as it pulls into an Oklahoma donkey farm. Tune in to CHD.TV!

Armadillos, Leprosy, PREP Act and more — Jessica Rose, Ph.D. and Michael Kane welcome viewers to this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD.’ Today, they cover research on relevant topics, including current health ‘threats’ and whether they are really something to be worried about or not and why. Watch the show on CHD.TV!

Rebecca Hardy and Polly Tommey sit down and chat, today, on ‘Good Morning CHD.’ First, they recap the Dallas event, which took place in collaboration with Texans for Vaccine Choice. Then, Rebecca shares her family’s story. Finally, Polly informs viewers of what’s coming up next for the CHD Bus Tour! Don’t miss it!

Look no further than CHD.TV to hear the latest health-related news from around the world. Topics discussed in this episode of ‘This Week’ include the following: HPV, excess deaths, censorship, AI, flu shots, college mandates, breast cancer and more. Viewers, be sure to watch!

Zoey O’Toole welcomes viewers to ‘Good Morning CHD’ for another deep-dive into a valuable book for the medical freedom movement. Celia Farber, author of ‘Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS,’ is today’s guest. In this interview, Celia and Zoey look at the characters, themes and major topics discussed in this bold narrative and tie it in to current pandemic rhetoric. Be sure to watch!

Jennifer and Cade Larson appear on ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week to share their experience with speech therapy and cancer treatment. This episode shines a light on the outstanding potential for kids and adults with nonverbal autism and how speech therapy can give them a voice. Viewers won’t want to miss it!

The case of Meryl Nass, M.D., which involves COVID treatment and medical license suspension, has developed into a first amendment lawsuit. Watch this week’s ‘Financial Rebellion’ episode to hear from Dr. Nass as she explains the censorship regime and its relationship to repurposed drugs and vaccine exemptions. Viewers, tune in!

Watch ‘Good Morning CHD’ today with host Polly Tommey, and watch interviews about vaccine harm and death. Are routine immunizations safe and effective? Were experimental COVID-19 shots all the mainstream media made them out to be? Find out on CHD.TV!

Michael Kane covers important legal updates, including ”one of the biggest fights of the COVID crisis” and also shares opportunities for getting involved in medical freedom advocacy on ‘Good Morning CHD’ today. But first, Polly reports from the CHD Bus with another heartbreaking story. Watch the episode on CHD.TV!

Tune in to ‘Good Morning CHD’ today to hear stories of vaccine injury and harm, beginning with an interview with Destiny Maynard, who recounts of the death of her son after HPV immunization. Then, watch as Jennifer Vacca shares her own personal story of reacting to the Pfizer COVID vaccine. “My life is…a shell of what I used to be,” Jennifer tells viewers.

Mary Holland and Polly Tommey inform viewers of pertinent news on ‘This Week.’ Today, discover the latest on GMO mosquitos and Malaria, immune suppression and Leprosy, pop-up clinics and healthcare in schools, COVID protocols and litigation and more. You won’t want to miss this jam-packed episode!

How are decisions made in Europe and at the WHO? Where does the power lie? Could unelected paid actors be dictating state and global health decisions for private gain? Wolfgang Wodarg, M.D., Ph.D., former Member of Parliament and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe examines the criminal business of pandemics, propaganda and fear in part 1 of new WHO chronicle special with James Corbett and Meryl Nass, M.D.

Is it ‘safe and effective’ to get vaccinated while pregnant? Dr. Nancy Tarlow and Dr. Brian Hooker go through some of the data related to this topic on ‘Doctors & Scientists’ this week. They take a look at the immunization schedule for expectant mothers and the reported adverse events after receiving the recommended injections. Tune in on CHD.TV!

With banking crises and account freezes on the horizon, can we trust any monetary institutions with our finances? Learn more relevant terminology and processes for navigating the economy on ‘Financial Rebellion’ this week, and get prepared for what is coming next.

Do you know what is in your food? Learn about the food supply, nutrition assistance programs and the safety of popular brands sold in the grocery store on ‘Good Morning CHD’ today. This, and more, on CHD.TV!

Noelle Florio is a teacher who was terminated after taking a stance against COVID mandates. Today, she joins host Michael Kane on ‘Good Morning CHD’ to share why she pushed back against masking and what happened as a result of staying true to her beliefs. Viewers, don’t miss it!

Dr. Joseph Mercola responds to the cancellation of his business bank accounts by JP Morgan Chase, today on ‘Good Morning CHD.’ What are the implications of this account closures on the financial system, digital currencies and personal freedoms? Watch this episode to find out!

Find out, today on ‘This Week,’ about new vaccines in the pipeline, groundbreaking research studies on the impacts of immunization, lawsuits, the removal of medical licenses and more. Also, Mary Holland and Polly Tommey share details of CHD’s Bus Tour and annual Conference. Tune in!

We are fighting a battle for our conscience. mRNA, GMO, neurotech, pandemic policies, cyberattacks, EMS — invisible to the naked eye, yet all fighting for power over the minds of humanity. Watch this episode of ‘Good Morning CHD’ with host Shabnam Palesa Mohammed and her guests for the shocking details on these ‘brain games.’

Not far off the coast of the United States lies the island of Bermuda. In the wake of the pandemic, American policies caused a ripple effect for this small country with the implementation of “harsh” and “extreme” measures and false media narratives. Today, on ‘Friday Roundtable,’ Eugene Dean shares details about the past few years in Bermuda and how he, and others, spoke up in opposition to the mainstream. Watch it on CHD.TV!